Theatre of the Mind Podcast Episodes

20 Comments

1. Posted by Rachel

   Wednesday 30 September, 2009

   I listened to this interview several months ago and thought it was very interesting. Anytime we can explore a technology that can help us I think it's foolish not to explore further. After the interview I still had questions so I read his book The Sanctuary and then gave the book to my friend who has a son with Autism. About once a month she calls up and thanks me because since her 7 year old son has been on AIM (about 8 months now) he has stopped doing a lot of the behaviors associated with Autism (repeating himself, hitting his ear, not making eye contact, staring into space). She can not believe it. And it didn't cost her anything. Stephen may not be the most gracious speaker, but the validity of this technology and his generosity seem pretty apparent. Thanks for having him on Kelly.

2. Posted by Jod

   Wednesday 30 September, 2009

   I'm catching up on all your podcasts as I've just discovered Theatre of the Mind. I really enjoy your podcasts, but have to say that this must have been an uncomfortable interview and the guest seemed to be on the defense.

3. Posted by Myeka

   Wednesday 30 September, 2009

   I enjoyed this interview. Kelly was obviously unprepared to interview her guest. This caused a clunmsiness to exist. This work is obviously cutting edge and cannot be explained in the normal manner. Stephen can improve on his communication skills, and does come across as arrogant, however he's human.

4. Posted by beek

   Wednesday 30 September, 2009

   I have listened to almost every available podcast on this site and learned something from every one except this one. After listening to Mr. Lewis I am not at all interested in AIM whether it works or not. I'm sorry I just have to be honest, he sounds like a phony.

5. Posted by Kelly

   Wednesday 30 September, 2009

   I haven't noticed anything different.

6. Posted by mysticgirl

   Wednesday 30 September, 2009

   Hi Kelly, Just wondering...since this podcst took place a year ago - were you on this program and did you notice any specific changes? I just started listeing to these podcasts - and I love them! You have a very genuine, pleasant nature and I think you do a good job of interviewing a varity of personalities - thanks for these great shows!

7. Posted by katrina

   Wednesday 30 September, 2009

   HI there! I'm new to this podcast so I'm just catching up here. This weekend my husband and I listened to the AIM podcast and we felt much like Alan did in the above comment. I thought Stephen's tone was defensive and arrogant. He seemed reluctant to answer anything directly. At one point He answered Kelly's question saying "if you'd read my book you'd know". Which was so lame!! He was given the opportunity to share(and promote)to a wide audience of people many of whom had never heard of his work(business).

8. Posted by katrina

   Wednesday 30 September, 2009

   *(continued from above) His answer was a shut-out and doesn't make me want to read his book. I learned nothing about him or his program accept his far fetched claims. I imagine his success rate is on par with placebo. I did like that he is offering free service to autistic children. So if what he claims is true why not have a heart and heal anyone that has a life threating disease that can't afford it. Why not go into one of the villages ravaged by AIDS in Africa? He would be a world hero and a saint. He could easily get a grant to do that if he could prove his system works.

9. Posted by mike

   Wednesday 30 September, 2009

   I am continually amazed at how people who really don't get it regress to an emotional response to justify their position or judgment. An individual's inability to understand intellectually does not make it untrue...just a challenge to implement in a way that supports their life. As someone who does have first hand experience with this technology and this man, I can assure you that what you "sense" is erroneous and that you might want to reassess...regardless of the interview. After all, it is your life...and therefore your choice and your responsibility. Choose wisely.

10. Posted by Alan

    Wednesday 30 September, 2009

    I actually didn't like this show at all, purely because Stephen's energy was not as genuine as it should have been. I sensed Kelly's uncomfortable and frustrating feeling towards Stephen's aloofness. I felt Stephen made far too many undermining comments of Kelly, as if Kelly should know better even though she asked genuine questions. It would have been possible for Stephen to give good technical information without giving the game away. People who are healers have a clean, calm, balanced and genuine energy about themselves. In my opinion, Stephen does not have this and so regardless of whether AIM works or not, Stephen's associated energy would not leave me feeling comfortable. Anyone else sense this?

11. Posted by Annie

    Wednesday 30 September, 2009

    I enjoyed the show. I know it might seem far-fetched to some people but the topic is not an easy one to cover in an hour. A few months ago, I decided to enroll myself and my dog on The AIM Program. The changes I have seen in myself and my dog are amazing! I use to have a migraine once a month, and now I can't even remember the last time I had one. My dog was suffering from arthritis due to a genetic condition that caused her to gain weight. She is no longer overweight, and jumps and plays like when she was a puppy. Thanks Kelly for another great show.

12. Posted by Kelly

    Wednesday 30 September, 2009

    Hi Amber, Dolores is coming to Santa Fe the end of April. I hope to do an interview with her. I'm taking her workshop.

13. Posted by Amber

    Wednesday 30 September, 2009

    I think the interview had a certain tone because Stephen is very brainy/techno combined with the fact that he wants to keep some things under his hat as well. My husband is rather a nerd and communication is not his strong point, and sometimes just getting him to tell me the details of his day is like pulling teeth, yet it is just the way his mind is "set up". Put another way, it's indicated in his astrology chart. Stephen's heart seems to be in the right place. I think Kelly's question regarding "use for negative purposes" was extremely perceptive, and explains a lot about his attitude of keeping his methods close to his chest. Not an easy interview Kelly, but if they were all easy, there'd be no thrills! Just a suggestion Kelly, but do you think you could ever get Dolores Cannon to come on your show? She must be fascinating.

14. Posted by shan1986

    Wednesday 30 September, 2009

    The interview was a little ackward because Kelly couldn't understand what Stephen was saying. I thought that Stephen was very clear on explaining how the AIM programs works. She asked a lot of weird questions, but he answered all of them, and I think he answered them well.

15. Posted by Douglas

    Wednesday 30 September, 2009

    I started on AIM after I heard Dr. Wayne Dyer speak highly of AIM on his tape series. I have had low vision for more than 40 years and have been on AIM for three years. Although I have macular degeneration, my eye sight has stayed stable the entire time I have been on AIM. Prior to AIM, my eyesight was declining each year. I thought Stephen & Kelly did a good job with this interview and AIM is clearly something you have to experience to truly appreciate. The best way to understand is to watch (or listen) to the tray tour video of AIM on their home page--energeticmatrix.com. I highly recommend AIM, it's changed my life in a very positive way.

16. Posted by Kelly

    Wednesday 30 September, 2009

    I admit I was a little frustrated with this interview because I still don't understand how the AIM technology works. I like Stephen and had a good experience with him when he did his private session with me. He picked up very specific physical issues that were surprisingly accurate. I'm still mystified

17. Posted by roxcat23

    Wednesday 30 September, 2009

    Same vibe, I got the impression that Kelly was a bit hostile towards this guest. His answers were a bit wishy washy at times but she did take him down a strange line of questionning... I am still curious about AIM, given the Wayne Dyer endorsement.

18. Posted by netedge

    Wednesday 30 September, 2009

    Really strange stuff - has anybody had any experience with this other than Kelly. I really didn't get a good feel for how Kelly felt about it.

19. Posted by Jamie

    Sunday 14 February, 2010

    Hello Kelly, I listened to this podcast a while back and didn't fully understand it but then I found out that I had the Sanctuary book that had been given to me with a bunch of other books and decided to read it. It was much easier to understand. I was convinced and I wanted to try the AIM program. Now I have the money for it but am still doing some research. Anyways I see that you said that he picked up very specific physical issues but then you said you haven't noticed anything different. So those physical issues haven't changed at all? I really trust your opinion and I would like to hear what you truly honestly think about the AIM program.

20. Posted by Holly

    Wednesday 19 May, 2010

    I love Kelly's podcasts- my iPod is full of them and her other work, I listen to her all the time. Usually I enjoy the podcasts and feel I'm learning something even if the subject doesn't especially resonate with me, but this guy was just a turn-off. Someone else articulated the exact thought that came to me while listening to him- that I don't need to hear another thing about AIM. I wouldn't go
    anywhere near it after hearing how arrogant, defensive and uncooperative he was in this interview- just plain not nice!